Ethical implications of artificial intelligence in healthcare: Contextualizing innovation, equity, and responsibility in a globalized era

Authors

  • Aminu J. Lasisi Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agriculture University of Delta, Agbor, 321211 Delta State, Nigeria jacob.lasisi@unidel.edu.ng +2347038079730 Author https://orcid.org/0009-0004-4781-3743
  • Fidelis Aghware Computer Science Department, Faculty of Computing, University of Delta, Agbor, 321011, Delta State Nigeria +2348033458475 Author https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7040-9387

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4314/

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, Healthcare Ethics, Algorithmic Bias, Informed Consent, Global Health Equity, AI Governance, Medical Data, Bioethics, Stakeholder Accountability

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming global healthcare by enabling significant advancements in diagnosis, treatment, and patient monitoring. Innovations like DeepMind's AI for ocular disease identification and Babylon Health's chatbot for virtual consultations exemplify AI's capacity to expand accessibility, minimize errors, and increase efficiency. Nevertheless, these technical advancements are accompanied by intricate ethical dilemmas — particularly in resource-limited and legally precarious environments — where concerns regarding patient consent, algorithmic transparency, and data sovereignty remain unresolved. This study contends that the integration of AI into healthcare is not merely a technological challenge but also an ethical and socio-political undertaking. This systematic review of 57 peer-reviewed studies and global policy reports underscores that AI's dependence on extensive datasets engenders issues regarding bias, privacy violations, and inequitable distribution of benefits, frequently reinforcing previous disparities in healthcare access. The notion of 'algorithmic colonialism' is analyzed, demonstrating how AI technologies created in affluent contexts may be ineffective when utilized in culturally diverse, resource-constrained settings. The paper suggests a multitiered ethical framework based on technical integrity, legal compliance, and community engagement to tackle these difficulties. This concept emphasizes culturally sensitive AI design, effective consent processes, accountability systems, and localized regulatory frameworks. Ultimately, the report argues for a multidisciplinary and context-aware strategy to ensure AI-driven healthcare innovation advances equity, protects vulnerable populations, and builds trust internationally.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

17-04-2026

Similar Articles

1-10 of 157

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.